Tag: George A. Barnett
A comparison of three methods to determine the subject matter in textual data
Authors George A. Barnett, Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, and Jeanette B. Ruiz Citation Barnett, G. A., Calabrese, C., & Ruiz, J. B. (2023). A comparison of three methods to determine the subject matter in textual data. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1104691 Abstract This study compares three different methods commonly employed for the determination…
Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China
Authors Jiaojiao Ji, Matthew Robbins, Jieyu Ding Featherstone, Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, and George A. Barnett. Citation Ji, J., Robbins, M., Featherstone, J. D., & Calabrese, C., Barnett, G. A. (2022). Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China. PLoS ONE, 17(5), e0267406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267406 Abstract The world’s first…
Understanding knowledge and perceptions of genome editing technologies: A textual analysis of major agricultural stakeholder groups
Authors Matthew Robbins, Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, Jieyu Ding Featherstone, and George A. Barnett. Citation Robbins, M., Calabrese, C., Featherstone, J. D., & Barnett, G. A. (2021). A textual analysis of agricultural stakeholder representations of genome editing technology. Journal of Science Communication, 20(5), A07. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20050207 Abstract The promise of CRISPR-Cas9 (CRISPR) genomic editing applied to agriculture…
Examining the relationship between gene editing knowledge, value predispositions, and general science attitudes among U.S. farmers, scientists, policymakers, and the general public
Authors Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, Jieyu Ding Featherstone, Matthew Robbins, and George A. Barnett Citation Calabrese, C., Featherstone, J. D., Robbins, M., & Barnett, G. A. (2021). Examining the relationship between gene editing knowledge, value predispositions, and general science attitudes among U.S. farmers, scientists, policymakers, and the general public. Journal of Science Communication, 20(2), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020202…
The uproar over gene-edited babies: A semantic network analysis of CRISPR on Twitter
Authors Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, Jieyu Ding Featherstone, Benjamin Millam, and George A. Barnett Citation Calabrese, C., Ding, J., Millam, B., & Barnett, G. A. (2020). The uproar over gene-edited babies: A semantic network analysis of CRISPR on Twitter. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1699135 Abstract CRISPR-Cas9, a recent gene editing technology, has potential to greatly impact…
Online representations of “genome editing” uncover opportunities for encouraging engagement: A semantic network analysis
Authors Christopher (CJ) Calabrese, Brittany N. Anderton, and George A. Barnett Citation Calabrese, C., Anderton, B. N., & Barnett, G. A. (2019). Online representations of “genome editing” uncover opportunities for encouraging engagement: A semantic network analysis. Science Communication, 41(2), 222-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018824709 Abstract Genome editing is an emerging socio-scientific issue. This study uses semantic network analysis…